RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01346 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His application for Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) be backdated to 12 Dec 10. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Once he required the necessary retainability, his Statement of Understanding (SOU) could not be signed because it had been previously signed. His original application was kicked back because he did not have enough retainability, when in fact he did. His application date is 12 Dec 10 and his date of separation is 23 Dec 14, making him eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of emails from the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) and his TEB Ineligibility Notification. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of master sergeant. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating that the applicant has not provided adequate justification/documentation regarding the communication issues he claims to have had. The applicant applied for the TEB on 15 Dec 10, and an email was sent to him from the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) the same day with instructions/requirements which he needed to accomplish prior to the TEB application being approve. His application expired on 7 Jan 11 because he did not sign a SOU. While the applicant did have the required retainability due to a reenlistment in 2009, the TEB SOU is required to acknowledge that he accepts the applicable Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) associated with TEB. The applicant has not provided evidence that he attempted to submit a SOU in 2010. Additionally, he did not inquire on this matter until 15 Jul 12, according to the notes in Right Now Technology (RNT). The applicant reapplied on 16 Jul 12, and while he completed the required SOU, he did not have four years retainability, and his application was rejected on 30 Jul 12. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 31 Mar 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility does not feel the applicant has provided adequate justification/documentation to support his claim. However, considering that at the time of his original 12 Dec 10 TEB application, he had the necessary retainability based on a previous reenlistment, we find it reasonable that he did not believe he was required to sign the SOU, as no ADSC would be incurred. Therefore, we find the evidence presented is sufficient to conclude the applicant took the necessary steps to transfer his benefits to his dependents. In view of the above, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 12 Dec 10, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01346 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Mar 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 26 Mar 13, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 13. Panel Chair